Compare

Each of these stops where the API stops.

Honest comparisons. Keep the tool you have for API-reachable apps; add StitchOps for the rest.

The difference

An agent inside your network.

Browser, desktop, terminal and directory actions from a worker VM in your environment, with credentials referenced from your vault and every step logged. That is the part no API-shaped tool reaches.

How it executes →

acme-dealers / worker-01

Run

Worker

worker-01 · connected

Windows Server 2022 · signed installer
outbound only · TLS 1.3 · 0 inbound ports
unattended session · dedicated VM

Capabilities

browser
desktop
terminal
file
ldap / ad

Systems reached today

DealerCONNECTbrowser14
Dealertrackbrowser9
DMS thick clientdesktop6
On-prem ADldap22
Report sharefile3

Secrets

31 references resolved on worker · 0 values sent to control plane

StitchOps vs Make

Keep the scenarios. Add the step that lands in a portal.

StitchOps vs n8n

Keep the orchestration. Add custody and evidence for UI work.

StitchOps vs ServiceNow

Keep the system of record. Add the fulfilment it cannot do.

StitchOps vs UiPath

Keep the bots. Add AI-authored workflows on an outbound agent.

StitchOps vs Workato

Keep the recipes. Add the systems they cannot reach.

StitchOps vs Zapier

Keep it for API-to-API. Add StitchOps where there is no API.

Start with one workflow that never had an API.

Fifteen minutes on your top three manual processes. We tell you which one to run first.

Book a free workflow audit Get a demo